banner unionsafete


Disgrace Of Coastguard Station Closures Policy And The Threat To Lives

The UK’s life saving Coastguard Station network has been under threat ever since the Tory-led Con-Dem(ned) coalition took office in 2010 and announced that a major cuts programme aimed at public services; would result in a cut of nine coastguards stations, including Liverpool’s station based in Crosby.

Coick the pic to sign the petitionThe importance of the Liverpool Coastguard Station cannot be underestimated as can be read on the campaign website to Save Liverpool Coastguard:

“As the only Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre on the west coast of England, the men and women of Liverpool Coastguard are responsible for keeping you, your family, your sea, and your shoreline safe.

From the Point of Ayr in North Wales to the Mull of Galloway in Southwest Scotland, the four main lakes in the Lake District, and the waters around the Isle of Man, the coastguard officers at Liverpool coordinate the response to many and varied emergencies. 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, the experienced, dedicated, and professional staff at Liverpool Coastguard are there to ensure the safety of you and your loved ones.”

Since the first review and planned closure programme was announced, lobbying of MPs, Lords plus a publicity exercise has been run by members of the Coastguard and the public supporting them.

The result has been to galvanise major opposition to the Tory plans, a further review, and what looks like a reduction in the number of closures; and some delay to the closing of those still designated for closure.

But the process and intentions of the government have been reduced to a farce, with David Cameron promising delays to the closure plans, whilst at the same time, the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) insisted that there would be no delays to the closures.

Below is a news report by Lynne Gray of the campaigning website SOS Coastguards which in relation to the closure delay to the Clyde Coastguard in Scotland; exemplifies the mess created around this issue and the fact that, as can be expected, the media seems incapable of reporting accurately on the situation:


The Coastguard SOS team is made up of members of the public who have serious concerns for the safety of people when the Coastguard stations closures are implemented, as unfortunately members of the actual Coastguard service are subject to gagging orders and cannot speak – who said this country was democratic?!

We’ve been telling you the good news that Mr Cameron stated in his letter;   “Finally, those centres that are planned for closure will remain open until 2015 in order to ensure that the planned transition to the new arrangements will maximise the retention of local knowledge.”

A very straightforward statement and one that was welcomed by the Coastguard SOS team fighting to keep all the stations open.  Thank goodness the Prime Minister has the sense to make sure the stations will stay open until 2015 at the very least, so that the changeover to a national call centre, would be smoother and give appropriate time for everything that would be necessary for the hand-overs.

Today, the news from Inverclyde Now gave the news about this, stating -

THE Clyde Coastguard rescue co-ordination centre at Greenock will close later this year as planned, it has been confirmed, despite a letter from the Prime Minister which appeared to say that Coastguard centres ear-marked for closure would stay open for another two years.

Coastguard campaigners received a copy of a letter from Prime Minister David Cameron to a constituent which stated:

“Those centres that are planned for closure will remain open until 2015 in order to ensure that the planned transitions to the new arrangements will maximise the retention of local knowledge.”

Campaigners issued statements saying the centres — including Clyde — had been granted a “reprieve.”

I would like to take issue with the words highlighted in red [italics] – the letter did not appear to state; the letter categorically stated that Coastguard centres earmarked for closure would stay open: and also for another two years; the years from 2012 to 2015 are three, unless my fundamental knowledge of mathematics is incorrect!

The page goes on to state -

But the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) insisted there has been no change to the plan and that Clyde Coastguard will shut in December with its work being transferred to the centres in Belfast and Stornoway.

Navy Buildings, Greenock

An MCA spokesman said: “The reform of Coastguard stations will go ahead as planned. The PM has written to his constituent to clarify the matter. (i) Under the plans the Coastguard co-ordination centres at Forth, Clyde, Great Yarmouth, Liverpool, Thames, Swansea, Brixham and Portland will close progressively by 31 March 2015.

“The Ministry of Defence (MoD) plan to close their base at Clyde [Navy Buildings in Eldon Street] and part of that plan means that the Clyde Coastguard and all its associated equipment must be removed. Staff are already informally aware of the intended closure date of 31 December 2012. (ii) 

A change team comprising operational staff from Clyde, Belfast and Stornoway is actively managing the technical and operational work required to achieve the decommissioning of Clyde by 31 December 2012. We aim to transfer operational coordination for Clyde’s area to Belfast and Stornoway by 18 December 2012. This will avoid trying to manage technical switchover during the Christmas period.”

Click to read newspaper story(i) The Prime Minister has written to this constituent to clarify the matter – indeed he has, and as said before, he categorically stated the coastguard stations would stay open until 2015.  There has been no other letter received.

(ii) Staff are already informally aware of the intended closure date of 31 December 2012.  And Happy New Year to you too! But seriously, what utter disregard and disrespect for the people in the team working there.

What an awful state of affairs this is.  The Prime Minister makes a statement in black and white and the MCA media team states this is incorrect! A very good question would be,  Who is running this country?

From the first announcement, this MCA plan has been riddled with inconsistencies and errors.  There has been no transparency, no listening to peoples’ concerns and, certainly, no risk and assessment exercises carried out on each particular station.  And, even more importantly, this is despite requests from the Welsh Assembly and the Scottish Parliament.  Horrendous ~ you cannot describe rocks and waves to a national call centre, which obviously does not have the local knowledge that is critical to successful rescues.

This is a cost cutting exercise that only benefits the Department of Transport and the elite of the MCA. Shame on them.


You can download the government's Coastguard closures programme document here and judge for yourself, the impact this will have on the lives of seafairers around this country's coasts. Surounded as we are by the North Sea on the East coast and the Irish Sea on the west coast, not to mention the North Atlantic Ocean to the south west, the coastguard stations are always busy saving lives and preventing major disasters.

Source: Lynne Gray / Coastguard SOS / Save Liverpool Coastguard

Further information can be found on these websites:

Save Liverpool Coastguard

Coastguard SOS

See also: Coastguard Stations Slashed Increasing Dangers For The West Coast



Designed, Hosted and Maintained by Union Safety Services